文津阁《四库全书》影印本使用中的问题及对策研究     

段永辉  李晓泽  李冠楠 《图书馆建设》2008,(8)

文津阁《四库全书》是7部《四库全书》中存放保管最完整的一部,是中华民族历史文化大典。文津阁《四库全书》影印本的出版,促进了世界各国学术界对中国文化的了解,利于中华民族文明的传播。由于当代读者对古籍分类不十分了解,致使在具体使用过程中存在着检索不便的问题。经过不断的研究探讨,针对上述问题提出了4种解决办法。  相似文献   

公众图书馆意识的调查报告   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

桑良至 《图书馆杂志》2006,25(2):29-33

本文阐明了公众图书馆意识调查运行状况、被调查人员职业及各个职业人数状况、这次调查的对象、涉及的年龄段与使用图书馆年龄高峰期、分析15个行业的调查数据，了解到公众对图书馆的意见，知道了图书馆应该拓展的服务、为谁服务、怎样服务等问题。  相似文献   

传承 创新 发展——重庆图书馆中层干部赴外省市图书馆考察报告     

王宁远  王祝康 《重庆图情研究》2006,7(3):49-55

通过中层干部对全国有关省市图书馆进行的为期十天的考察和学习，颇有收获与体会，结合本馆实际工作和新馆建设的任务，提出了一系列合理的意见和建议。  相似文献   

从分类主题论文看图书馆学研究的方向与趋势--基于十种图书馆学核心期刊五年载文的分析   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

张正 《图书情报知识》2004,(2):16-18

本文从分类主题入手 ,通过对《中国图书馆学报》等十种图书馆学核心期刊五年来的载文统计分析 ,探讨了图书馆学研究的主要方向 ,并预测其未来的发展趋势  相似文献   

对开展社会科学成果查新研究的探讨   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

许家梁刘彦庆  褚衍昌 《津图学刊》2004,(3):4-6,29

本文认为，国内现有的自然科学成果查新机构无法适应社会科学成果查新需要，建立全国性社科成果查新体系势在必行。为此，需要开展相关的社会科学成果查新研究。本文对开展社会科学成果查新研究的背景、意义、内容和方法进行了探讨。  相似文献   

高校图书馆人对农村图书馆问题的忧思   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

王虹 《图书情报知识》2005,(6):46-48

对农村图书馆问题的研究,体现着时代的要求、学术研究的境界和中国图书馆事业发展的进程。高校关心农村图书馆建设,具有理论价值和实际意义,当前应重点关注农村图书馆的统计、管理和服务工作等机制。  相似文献   

Organizational Power and the Institutional Review Board     

Debbie S. Dougherty  Michael W. Kramer 《Journal of Applied Communication Research》2005,33(3):277-284

In this essay, we respond to the narratives and essays in this issue by examining organizational power issues related to researchers and institutional research boards (IRBs). Rather than taking a singular perspective on power, we use multiple perspectives and suggest that the cumulative analyses provide the best understanding of IRBs and organizational power.  相似文献   

共词分析聚合研究领域的表面效度研究:基于自然语言处理     

周文杰  张彤彤  高冲 《高校图书馆工作》2018,(2):12-16

为考察共词分析在研究领域聚合中的有效性,本研究以1988年～2017年三十年间发表且收录于WoS(Web of Science)数据库的计算机科学、地理学、数学、应用化学和应用物理学等五个学科的标题、摘要和关键词为分析对象,对不同分析单元下所聚合的研究领域的表面效度进行了检验。研究发现,关键词在研究领域聚合中具有相对最高的表面效度,摘要和题名的效度则相对较低。然而,本研究也发现,科学计量领域现有聚类指标和工具所聚合的研究领域缺乏区分能力且各种指标均存在着一定的效度风险。本研究的发现对于丰富科学计量领域关于研究领域聚合有效性的认识具有重要理论意义。  相似文献   

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation     

Theocharis Katrakazis  Cath Dillon  Petra Juvan  Stavroula Golfomitsou 《文物保护研究》2018,63(8):450-465

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.  相似文献   

The Changing Research Data Landscape and the Experiences of Ethics Review Board Chairs: Implications for Library Practice and Partnerships     

Brian Jackson 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(5):603-612

Academic libraries have to a large extent taken the lead in facilitating new approaches to research data management, but changes to the research data landscape have had an impact on numerous areas of academic work, including ethics review. Using interpretive phenomenological analysis of interviews with chairs of Canadian research ethics boards, this study explores how ethics review boards have experienced changes to data policy and related technologies in order to describe the ethical implications of new approaches to data management and to explore ways in which the library, ethics review boards, and other campus partners might harmonize efforts to support emerging data practices. While ethics review boards in Canada are keenly aware of open data policies, data publishing in practice is still nascent. There is uncertainty about the adoption of changing technologies for research and their impacts on privacy protection. Where responsibility lies for addressing these uncertainties is often unclear. Academic libraries and research ethics boards are well-suited to engage in mutual knowledge transfer and to integrate data management planning and ethics review processes. Institutional-level oversight that includes all campus departments impacted by changes to the research data landscape may facilitate improved communication and reduce role ambiguity.  相似文献